대화주의와 아이러니
Bakhtin’s theory of dialogism illuminates pluralistic attitude in modern, even post-modern literature and culture. His refusal of monologic systems parallels the development of modern literary theory which emphasizes the heterogeneous elements and therefore, insists the possibility of various meanin...
Saved in:
Published in | 영미연구 Vol. 33; pp. 161 - 178 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Korean |
Published |
Institute of British & American Studies Center for International Area Studies Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
28.02.2015
한국외국어대학교 영미연구소 영미연구소 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2508-4135 2508-5417 |
Cover
Summary: | Bakhtin’s theory of dialogism illuminates pluralistic attitude in modern, even post-modern literature and culture. His refusal of monologic systems parallels the development of modern literary theory which emphasizes the heterogeneous elements and therefore, insists the possibility of various meanings of the text.
Not many, however, noticed that besides Bakhtin’s dialogism, irony also witnessed the similar development. The difference between the speaking and the meaning in irony also implies the possibility of various interpretations of a text and denies unitary, monologic view on the world.
In this sense, dialogism and irony have much in common. Both emphasizes heterogeneity and variety in text and interpretation. This paper therefore, reviews the development of irony and analyzes its similarity with dialogism. This approach thus helps to understand Bakhtin’s dialogism in a wider context, and makes it possible to have historical view on the modern literary trend based on plurality and heterogeneity of the text. KCI Citation Count: 4 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | G704-SER000014742.2015.33..013 |
ISSN: | 2508-4135 2508-5417 |