Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally- printed and milled materials after surface treatment and artificial aging

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally (3D)-printed materials after various surface treatments and artificial aging compared with that bonded to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) polymethy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKorean journal of orthodontics (2012) Vol. 53; no. 1; pp. 45 - 53
Main Authors Ameer Biadsee, Ofir Rosner, Carol Khalil, Vanina Atanasova, Joel Blushtein, Shifra Levartovsky
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published Korean Association of Orthodontists 31.01.2023
대한치과교정학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally (3D)-printed materials after various surface treatments and artificial aging compared with that bonded to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-milled materials. Methods: Eighty cylindrical specimens were 3D printed and divided into the following four subgroups (n = 20 each) according to the surface treatment and artificial aging procedure. Group A, sandblasted with 50 ㎛ aluminum oxide particles (SA) and aging; group B, sandblasted with 30 ㎛ silica-coated alumina particles (CO) and aging; group C, SA without aging; and group D, CO without aging. For the control group, 20 CAD-CAM PMMA-milled cylindrical specimens were sandblasted with SA and aged. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine (0.25 mm/min), examined at ×2.5 magnification for failure mode classification, and statistically analyzed (p = 0.05). Results: The retention obtained with the 3D-printed materials (groups A-D) was higher than that obtained with the PMMA-milled materials (control group). However, no significant difference was found between the study and control groups, except for group C (SA without aging), which showed significantly higher retention than the control group (PMMA-SA and thermocycling) (p = 0.037). Study groups A-D predominantly exhibited a cohesive specimen mode, indicating specimen fracture. Conclusions: Orthodontic brackets bonded to 3D-printed materials exhibit acceptable bonding strengths. However, 3D-printed materials are prone to cohesive failure, which may result in crown fractures.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO202313857155104
ISSN:2234-7518
2005-372X