정면과 측면에 위치시킨 마이크로 소프트 키넥트 2로 측정한 보행 시공간 변인 정확성 비교

Background: The Microsoft Kinect which is a low-cost gaming device has been studied as a promise clinical gait analysis tool having satisfactory reliability and validity. However, its accuracy is only guaranteed when it is properly positioned in front of a subject. Objects: The purpose of this study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHan'guk Chŏnmun Mulli Ch'iryo Hakhoe chi = Journal of the Korean Academy of University Trained Physical Therapists Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 1 - 7
Main Authors 황지선, Jisun Hwang, 김은진, Eun-jin Kim, 황선홍, Seonhong Hwang
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한국전문물리치료학회 28.02.2019
Korean Academy Of University Trained Physical Therapy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: The Microsoft Kinect which is a low-cost gaming device has been studied as a promise clinical gait analysis tool having satisfactory reliability and validity. However, its accuracy is only guaranteed when it is properly positioned in front of a subject. Objects: The purpose of this study was to identify the error when the Kinect was positioned at a 45˚ angle to the longitudinal walking plane compare with those when the Kinect was positioned in front of a subject. Methods: Sixteen healthy adults performed two testing sessions consisting of walking toward and 45˚ obliquely the Kinect. Spatiotemporal outcome measures related to stride length, stride time, step length, step time and walking speed were examined. To assess the error between Kinect and 3D motion analysis systems, mean absolute errors (MAE) were determined and compared. Results: MAE of stride length, stride time, step time and walking speed when the Kinect set in front of subjects were investigated as .36, .04, .20 and .32 respectively. MAE of those when the Kinect placed obliquely were investigated as .67, .09, .37, and .58 respectively. There were significant differences in spatiotemporal outcomes between the two conditions. Conclusion: Based on our study experience, positioning the Kinect directly in front of the person walking towards it provides the optimal spatiotemporal data. Therefore, we concluded that the Kinect should be placed carefully and adequately in clinical settings.
Bibliography:KOREAN ACADEMY OF UNIVERSITH TRAINED PHYSICAL THERAPISTS
KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201912261948508
https://www.ptkorea.org/journal/view.html?uid=864&vmd=Full
ISSN:1225-8962
2287-982X
DOI:10.12674/ptk.2019.26.1.001