Failures Lessons for Theory

In principle, a party engages in a negotiation because he thinks he can obtain something he would not otherwise. This difference is the added value of negotiating. Ultimately a party signs an agreement because this agreement brings an added value sufficient to justify his signature. It is obvious th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUnfinished Business p. 357
Main Author GUY OLIVIER FAURE
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published University of Georgia Press 01.08.2012
Subjects
Alternative dispute resolution
Armed conflict
Behavioral sciences
Civil law
Civil remedies
Communications
Conflict
Crime victims
Diplomacy
Hostages
Human behavior
Human populations
International agreements
International cooperation
International law
International politics
International relations
Law
Mediation
Military science
Negotiation
Peace treaties
Persons
Political organizations
Political parties
Political science
Politics
Population studies
Social behavior
Social interaction
Social sciences
Treaties
War
War conflict
War theaters
World wars
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In principle, a party engages in a negotiation because he thinks he can obtain something he would not otherwise. This difference is the added value of negotiating. Ultimately a party signs an agreement because this agreement brings an added value sufficient to justify his signature. It is obvious that an agreement must include the implementation so that it is not just a piece of paper. Thus, the Munich Accords of 1938 fall into the vast category of unfinished business, for they were not respected. The negotiations aiming to end World War I in 1916 belong to the same category. The
ISBN:0820343145
9780820343143