Development of a Machine Learning Model for Bias Correction of Chemical Transport Models Targeting Photochemical Oxidants

This study describes a method for constructing a machine learning model to correct bias in a chemical transport model. When the neural network model was trained with data periods ranging from one to three years, it was observed that extending the training period enhanced the accuracy of the bias cor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Japan Society for Atmospheric Environment / Taiki Kankyo Gakkaishi Vol. 60; no. 2; pp. 11 - 19
Main Authors Sugata, Seiji, Yamamura, Yuki, Hirose, Chiyoko, Yamamoto, Shigekazu
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japan Society for Atmospheric Environment 21.02.2025
公益社団法人 大気環境学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1341-4178
2185-4335
DOI10.11298/taiki.60.11

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study describes a method for constructing a machine learning model to correct bias in a chemical transport model. When the neural network model was trained with data periods ranging from one to three years, it was observed that extending the training period enhanced the accuracy of the bias correction. This improvement is attributed to the increased variety of meteorological characteristics and air pollution patterns incorporated into the model, resulting in a greater versatility. A comparison of bias correction accuracy between machine learning models and a simple linear regression model revealed that all the machine learning models performed better. Specifically, for data with observed values of 80 ppb or more, the linear regression model exhibited greater error and a more pronounced tendency toward underestimation compared to the machine learning models. To address the oversight of high concentrations, a weighting factor was applied to the data with observed values of 80 ppb or more and calculated values more than 30% lower than the observed values, and the neural network model was trained. Consequently, the proportion of data with observed values of 80 ppb or more that fell within a 30% error margin increased to 90%.
ISSN:1341-4178
2185-4335
DOI:10.11298/taiki.60.11