Interobserver reliability of pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to have two examiners who engaged urogynecology at different institution evaluate the interobserver reliability of site-specific measurements and the stages of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system.STUDY DESIGN: Subjects were women attending the Urogyne C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Female Pelvic Floor Medicine Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 60 - 64
Main Authors Ohta, Toshiharu, Kikuchi, Mina, Miwa, Kosei, Ito, Naoki, Yamagiwa, Saburo, Kato, Junko, Moriyama, Yoji, Masue, Takako, Nagatani, Mitsuhiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japanese Society of Female Felvic Floor Medicine 16.01.2021
日本女性骨盤底医学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2187-5669
2434-8996
DOI10.32310/jfpfm.17.1_60

Cover

More Information
Summary:OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to have two examiners who engaged urogynecology at different institution evaluate the interobserver reliability of site-specific measurements and the stages of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system.STUDY DESIGN: Subjects were women attending the Urogyne Center of Gifu Red Cross Hospital who presented applicable symptoms or needed regular examinations after POP surgery and completed informed consent procedures. The subjects underwent examinations by two experienced examiners. One examiner was a urologist and the other was a gynecologist; each examiner was blind to the results of the other’s examination results. The reproducibility of the nine site-specific measurements was analyzed with Spearman’s correlation coefficient (γs), and the compartment stage and summary stage were analyzed with the weighted kappa correlation coefficient (κ).RESULTS: 32 subjects were recruited (mean age 68.0±9.3 years, mean parity 2.3±1.0, 3 women underwent hysterectomy). Correlations for Aa, Ba, Gh, Ap, Bp, D were statistically high and for C, Pb, Tvl were moderate. (γs for Aa: 0.909, Ba: 0.908, C: 0.486, Gh: 0.803, Pb: 0.440, Tvl: 0.318, Ap: 0.592, Bp: 592, D: 0.600, p=0.077 to <0.001). Staging was very highly reproducible. (κ for anterior wall: 0.873, posterior wall: 0.543, cervix/ vaginal vault: 0.662, summary stage: 0.820, p<0.001). Overall, 72% of the summary stages were fully consistent. With no single subject was there a variance of more than one stage.CONCLUSIONS: Highly consistent interobserver reproducibility of the POP-Q staging was confirmed in this study.
ISSN:2187-5669
2434-8996
DOI:10.32310/jfpfm.17.1_60