Interview on Film Semiology

Raymond Bellour: Can we consider yourEssais sur la Signification au Cinéma(Paris, Klincksieck 1968) as the first book of film semiology? Christian Metz: On a level that I would call ‘official’, we could indeed, and it has been done. Nonetheless, in my opinion, this is not the first book where we can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inConversations with Christian Metz pp. 83 - 108
Main Authors Bellour, Raymond, Metz, Christian
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Amsterdam University Press 15.11.2017
Subjects
Anthropology
Applied anthropology
Applied sciences
Behavioral sciences
Communications
Communications media
Continental philosophy
Cultural anthropology
Cultural studies
Engineering
Film studies
Language
Linguistics
Metaphilosophy
Movies
Narratives
Phenomenology
Philosophy
Semiotics
Signification
Social sciences
Structural analysis
Structural engineering
Structural linguistics
Temporality
Theoretical linguistics
Visual materials
Western philosophy
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Raymond Bellour: Can we consider yourEssais sur la Signification au Cinéma(Paris, Klincksieck 1968) as the first book of film semiology? Christian Metz: On a level that I would call ‘official’, we could indeed, and it has been done. Nonetheless, in my opinion, this is not the first book where we can find reflections of this nature. We must not forget the various contributions of the Russian formalists, in particular the collective anthologyPoetika Kino(Film Poetics), on which Shklovsky, Tynianov and Eichenbaum collaborated. Additionally, in a more diffuse, scattered manner, there are certain passages in the writings of
ISBN:9789089648259
9089648259
DOI:10.1515/9789048526734-009