Mediation by M3‐muscarinic receptors of both endothelium‐dependent contraction and relaxation to acetylcholine in the aorta of the spontaneously hypertensive rat

1 Experiments were designed to characterize the subtype(s) of endothelial muscarinic receptor that mediate(s) endothelium‐dependent relaxation and contraction in the aorta of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). 2 Rings of SHR aorta with endothelium were suspended in organ baths for the measuremen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of pharmacology Vol. 112; no. 2; pp. 519 - 524
Main Authors Boulanger, Chantal M., Morrison, Keith J., Vanhoutte, Paul M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.1994
Nature Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:1 Experiments were designed to characterize the subtype(s) of endothelial muscarinic receptor that mediate(s) endothelium‐dependent relaxation and contraction in the aorta of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). 2 Rings of SHR aorta with endothelium were suspended in organ baths for the measurement of isometric force. Ecothiopate (an inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase) was present throughout the experiments. Endothelium‐dependent contraction to acetylcholine was studied in quiescent aortic rings in the presence of NG‐nitro‐l‐arginine (to prevent the formation of nitric oxide). Endothelium‐dependent relaxation to acetylcholine was obtained during contraction to phenylephrine and in the presence of indomethacin (to inhibit cyclo‐oxygenase activity). Responses to acetylcholine were assessed against the non‐preferential muscarinic receptor antagonist, atropine, and the preferential antagonists pirenzepine (M1), methoctramine (M2) and 4‐diphenylacetoxy‐N‐methylpiperidine methobromide (4‐DAMP; M3). 3 The potency of acetylcholine in inducing endothelium‐dependent contraction was 6.54 ± 0.07 (EC50). Atropine, pirenzepine, methoctramine and 4‐DAMP displayed competitive antagonism towards the endothelium‐dependent contraction to acetylcholine. The pA2 values for these muscarinic receptor antagonists were estimated from Arunlakshana‐Schild plots to be (– log m) 9.48 ± 0.07, 6.74 ± 0.22, 6.30 ± 0.20 and 9.39 ± 0.22 respectively. The potency of acetylcholine in inducing endothelium‐dependent relaxation was 7.82 ± 0.09 (IC50). Atropine, pirenzepine and 4‐DAMP displayed competitive antagonism towards the endothelium‐dependent relaxation to acetylcholine but methoctramine had no effect. The pA2 values for atropine and 4‐DAMP for the relaxation to acetylcholine were estimated from Arunlakshana‐Schild plots to be (– log m) 9.15 ± 0.23 and 9.63 ± 0.28, respectively. These results suggest that the muscarinic M3 receptor subtype mediates both endothelium‐dependent relaxation and contraction to acetylcholine in SHR aorta.
Bibliography:The authors wish to thank Barnabas Desta, Nusret Didzik and Shawn Latta for their technical assistance and Joanna Bale for secretarial help. This work was supported, in part, by a grant from the National Institute of Health (HL 35614) and a Grant‐in‐Aid from the ‘Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier’, Paris (F).
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1188
1476-5381
DOI:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb13104.x