TOWARD CLASSICAL LEGAL POSITIVISM
When H.L.A. Hart defended legal positivism in his famous Holmes Lecture, he sought to do so "as part of the history of an idea." In his hands this idea grew out of two philosophical traditions. One of them was utilitarianism, the belief that the moral assessment of states of affairs must b...
Saved in:
Published in | Virginia law review Vol. 101; no. 4; pp. 987 - 1022 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Charlottesville
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW ASSOCIATION
01.06.2015
The Virginia Law Review Association |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | When H.L.A. Hart defended legal positivism in his famous Holmes Lecture, he sought to do so "as part of the history of an idea." In his hands this idea grew out of two philosophical traditions. One of them was utilitarianism, the belief that the moral assessment of states of affairs must be based on their contribution to happiness, while the other was "the important truth that a purely analytical study of legal concepts, a study of the meaning of the distinctive vocabulary of the law, was as vital to our understanding of the nature of law as historical or sociological studies." Together these two ideas led to a "simple but vital distinction" between "law as it is [and] law as it ought to be." |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 2019-10-18T20:18:14+11:00 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, Vol. 101, No. 4, Jun 2015: 987-1022 Informit, Melbourne (Vic) VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, Vol. 101, No. 4, Jun 2015, 987-1022 |
ISSN: | 0042-6601 1942-9967 |