Verification of LINE Encryption Version 1.0 Using ProVerif

LINE is currently the most popular messaging service in Japan. Communications using LINE are protected by the original encryption scheme, called LINE Encryption, and specifications of the client-to-server transport encryption protocol and the client-to-client message end-to-end encryption protocol a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvances in Information and Computer Security Vol. 11049; pp. 158 - 173
Main Authors Shi, Cheng, Yoneyama, Kazuki
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Springer International Publishing AG 2018
Springer International Publishing
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:LINE is currently the most popular messaging service in Japan. Communications using LINE are protected by the original encryption scheme, called LINE Encryption, and specifications of the client-to-server transport encryption protocol and the client-to-client message end-to-end encryption protocol are published by the Technical Whitepaper. Though a spoofing attack (i.e., a malicious client makes another client misunderstand the identity of the peer) and a reply attack (i.e., a message in a session is sent again in another session by a man-in-the-middle adversary, and the receiver accepts these messages) to the end-to-end protocol have been shown, no formal security analysis of these protocols is known. In this paper, we show a formal verification result of secrecy of application data and authenticity for protocols of LINE Encryption (Version 1.0) by using the automated security verification tool ProVerif. Especially, since it is claimed that the transport protocol satisfies forward secrecy (i.e., even if the static private key is leaked, security of application data is guaranteed), we verify forward secrecy for client’s data and for server’s data of the transport protocol, and we find an attack to break secrecy of client’s application data. Moreover, we find the spoofing attack and the reply attack, which are reported in previous papers.
ISBN:9783319979151
3319979159
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-97916-8_11