がん検診の意義と限界 −−子宮頸がん検診を例に

Cervical cancer is common among women. Screening for cervical cancer is useful for detecting and treating the disease at an early stage. Cancer screening has advantages as well as disadvantages. In particular, we need to consider both advantages and disadvantages of population-based cancer screening...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTairyoku kagaku. Japanese journal of physical fitness and sports medicine Vol. 67; no. 2; pp. 131 - 135
Main Author 井坂, ゆかり
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Tokyo 一般社団法人日本体力医学会 01.01.2018
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0039-906X
1881-4751
DOI10.7600/jspfsm.67.131

Cover

More Information
Summary:Cervical cancer is common among women. Screening for cervical cancer is useful for detecting and treating the disease at an early stage. Cancer screening has advantages as well as disadvantages. In particular, we need to consider both advantages and disadvantages of population-based cancer screening and try to minimize disadvantages to ensure cancer control. Disadvantages include false-positive and false-negative results and over-diagnosis. Due to trade-off characteristic of population-based cancer screening, typically we obtain more false-positive results in consequence of lessened false-negative results. It has been reported that even if the result is false-positive, patients experience adverse effects, such as physical, psychological, and economical burdens and decreased quality of life owing to the additional examinations until the accurate results are obtained. Hence, we need to determine concrete measures to avoid these adverse effects. This article discusses the importance and limitations of cancer screening, especially the adverse effects in patients with false-positive screening results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0039-906X
1881-4751
DOI:10.7600/jspfsm.67.131