Risk perception differences in a community with a municipal solid waste incinerator

Using a community model of risk perception, we conducted an environmental risk perception survey in a community with an operating municipal solid waste incinerator to further understanding of community responses to technology perceived as "hazardous". The specific aims of the survey were t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCanadian journal of public health Vol. 84; no. 5; p. 321
Main Authors Ostry, A S, Hertzman, C, Teschke, K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland 01.09.1993
Subjects
Attitude to Health
British Columbia
Community Participation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Data Collection
Environmental Exposure
Female
Health Education
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Incineration
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Psychological
Public Opinion
Social Desirability
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:Using a community model of risk perception, we conducted an environmental risk perception survey in a community with an operating municipal solid waste incinerator to further understanding of community responses to technology perceived as "hazardous". The specific aims of the survey were to study attitudes to waste management (incineration in particular) and to identify sociological attributes which help shape community attitudes to the facility. Approximately one third of the community were unaware of the incinerator. Those unaware gave lower desirability ratings to incinerator technology than the aware group. About half of the aware group were concerned about the facility and rated the incinerator in the same way as those who were unaware; however, the remainder (the unconcerned) appear to have accepted the incinerator. The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that informing the public about technology perceived as hazardous may not lead to alarm, but may in fact increase acceptance.
ISSN:0008-4263