Correlation of BRAFV600E Mutation and Glucose Metabolism in Thyroid Cancer Patients: An ¹⁸F-FDG PET Study

There is significant interest in a better understanding of the genetic underpinnings of the increased glucose metabolic rates of cancer cells. Thyroid cancer demonstrates a broad variability of (18)F-FDG uptake as well as several well-characterized oncogenic mutations. In this study, we evaluated th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) Vol. 56; no. 5; pp. 662 - 667
Main Authors Nagarajah, James, Ho, Alan L, Tuttle, R Michael, Weber, Wolfgang A, Grewal, Ravinder K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.05.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is significant interest in a better understanding of the genetic underpinnings of the increased glucose metabolic rates of cancer cells. Thyroid cancer demonstrates a broad variability of (18)F-FDG uptake as well as several well-characterized oncogenic mutations. In this study, we evaluated the differences in glucose metabolism of the BRAF(V600E) mutation versus BRAF wild-type (BRAF-WT) in patients with metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC). Forty-eight DTC and 34 PDTC patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT for tumor staging were identified from a database search. All patients were tested for the BRAF(V600E) mutation and assigned to 1 of 2 groups: BRAF(V600E) mutated and BRAF-WT. (18)F-FDG uptake of tumor tissue was quantified by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the hottest malignant lesion in 6 prespecified body regions (thyroid bed, lymph nodes, lung, bone, soft tissue, and other). When there were multiple lesions in 1 of the prespecified body regions, only the 1 with the highest (18)F-FDG uptake was analyzed. In the DTC cohort, 24 tumors harbored a BRAF(V600E) mutation, whereas 24 tumors were BRAF-WT. (18)F-FDG uptake of BRAF(V600E)-positive lesions (median SUVmax, 6.3; n = 53) was significantly higher than that of BRAF-WT lesions (n = 39; median SUVmax, 4.7; P = 0.019). In the PDTC group, only 5 tumors were BRAF(V600E)-positive, and their (18)F-FDG uptake was not significantly different from the BRAF-WT tumors. There was also no significant difference between the SUVmax of all DTCs and PDTCs, regardless of BRAF mutational status (P = 0.90). These data suggest that BRAF(V600E)-mutated DTCs are significantly more (18)F-FDG-avid than BRAF-WT tumors. The effect of BRAF(V600E) on tumor glucose metabolism in PDTC needs further study in larger groups of patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-5505
1535-5667
DOI:10.2967/jnumed.114.150607