Survey on once-daily therapy with ceftriaxone for pediatric bacterial infections

The use of antibacterial agents must have had a broad antibacterial spectrum and a strong antibacterial effect, and the medication plan of an antibacterial agent also considers pharmacokinetics in the treatment of bacterial infection. It is important to determine a medication interval based on “time...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese Journal of Chemotherapy Vol. 55; no. 6; pp. 463 - 472
Main Authors Takesue, Yoshio, Aoki, Nobuki, Kaku, Mitsuo, Gotoh, Naomasa, Kohno, Shigeru, Niki, Yoshihito, Mikamo, Hiroshige, Iwata, Satoshi, Kumon, Hiromi, Monden, Kouichi, Sunakawa, Keisuke, Wada, Kouichi
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japanese Society of Chemotherapy 2007
公益社団法人 日本化学療法学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1340-7007
1884-5886
DOI10.11250/chemotherapy1995.55.463

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The use of antibacterial agents must have had a broad antibacterial spectrum and a strong antibacterial effect, and the medication plan of an antibacterial agent also considers pharmacokinetics in the treatment of bacterial infection. It is important to determine a medication interval based on “time above MIC” from a PK/PD in β-lactam antibacterial agents. Ceftriaxone (CTRX), an injectable cephem antibacterial agent, has a broad antibacterial spectrum and strong antibacterial effect, and showed sufficient antibacterial effect in once-daily treatment and that the half-life in blood is very long. The Japanese Society of Chemotherapy strongly desires the approval for a once-daily dosing regimen of CTRX. A survey on once-daily treatment with CTRX in pediatric bacterial infections yielded the following results. Some 51% of respondents (28/55 doctors) had used CTRX in once-daily treatment. The distribution of dosage and term were 50-59 mg/kg for 5 days in inpatients and 20-59 mg/kg for 3 days in outpatients. Advantages included outpatient use, administration without hospitalization equipment, maintenance of patient and family QOL and cutting of medical expenses after approval of once-daily CTRX treatment. Disadvantages included difficulty of the correspondence to the patients' emergency and the correspondence to adverse reactions of CTRX such as a drug allergy. The intentions to suppose that respondents want to use once-daily CTRX treatment were 80% for outpatients and 51% for inpatients respectively. We consider that sufficient information about advantages and disadvantages of once-daily CTRX treatment should be offered to physicians for an appropriate use of this regimen.
ISSN:1340-7007
1884-5886
DOI:10.11250/chemotherapy1995.55.463