Survey on once-daily therapy with ceftriaxone for pediatric bacterial infections
The use of antibacterial agents must have had a broad antibacterial spectrum and a strong antibacterial effect, and the medication plan of an antibacterial agent also considers pharmacokinetics in the treatment of bacterial infection. It is important to determine a medication interval based on “time...
Saved in:
Published in | Japanese Journal of Chemotherapy Vol. 55; no. 6; pp. 463 - 472 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Japanese |
Published |
Japanese Society of Chemotherapy
2007
公益社団法人 日本化学療法学会 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1340-7007 1884-5886 |
DOI | 10.11250/chemotherapy1995.55.463 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The use of antibacterial agents must have had a broad antibacterial spectrum and a strong antibacterial effect, and the medication plan of an antibacterial agent also considers pharmacokinetics in the treatment of bacterial infection. It is important to determine a medication interval based on “time above MIC” from a PK/PD in β-lactam antibacterial agents. Ceftriaxone (CTRX), an injectable cephem antibacterial agent, has a broad antibacterial spectrum and strong antibacterial effect, and showed sufficient antibacterial effect in once-daily treatment and that the half-life in blood is very long. The Japanese Society of Chemotherapy strongly desires the approval for a once-daily dosing regimen of CTRX. A survey on once-daily treatment with CTRX in pediatric bacterial infections yielded the following results. Some 51% of respondents (28/55 doctors) had used CTRX in once-daily treatment. The distribution of dosage and term were 50-59 mg/kg for 5 days in inpatients and 20-59 mg/kg for 3 days in outpatients. Advantages included outpatient use, administration without hospitalization equipment, maintenance of patient and family QOL and cutting of medical expenses after approval of once-daily CTRX treatment. Disadvantages included difficulty of the correspondence to the patients' emergency and the correspondence to adverse reactions of CTRX such as a drug allergy. The intentions to suppose that respondents want to use once-daily CTRX treatment were 80% for outpatients and 51% for inpatients respectively. We consider that sufficient information about advantages and disadvantages of once-daily CTRX treatment should be offered to physicians for an appropriate use of this regimen. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1340-7007 1884-5886 |
DOI: | 10.11250/chemotherapy1995.55.463 |