生徒指導にかかわる教師教育改善への一考察 : 大学教師意識調査結果をふまえて(V 研究報告)

• Published in: Bulletin of the Japan Educational Administration Society Vol. 15; pp. 269 - 289
• Main Authors: 八尾坂, 修, 坂本, 孝徳, 牛渡, 淳
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Japanese
• Published: 日本教育行政学会 1989; The Japan Educational Administration Society
• Subjects: In-service Education; Pre-service Education; Student Guidance; Teacher Certificate; University Faculty
• ISSN: 0919-8393; 2433-1899
• DOI: 10.24491/jeas.15.0_269

Nowadays we have many problems about school education. They are: increase of problem behaviors and its variousness among students,: teachers' critical forecasting about student guidance,: stream of increasing required subjects for teaching due to the amendment of teacher certification law. Therein we have establishment which should be investigated, i.e. how should pre-service education and in-service education for student guidance be. On this view we argue on the following three subjects. 1. To make clear what opinions and demand would be found out about pre-service education and in-service education concerning the student guidance. 2. To analyze and consider the existing circumstances of pre-service education and consciousness of each university faculty who is in charge of proving pre-service education concerning student guidance. 3. According to those results, to research how we can improve pre-service education concerning student guidance. To approach these problems we also carried out a study about consciousness of university and college faculties who hold the chair of "Principles of Education" in public or private universities or colleges all over Japan. As a result, we found out as follows. For the demand from the spot of school to fill up pre-service education concerning student guidance, the university faculty don't object to it generally, at least on their conciousness. But as for the way to improve pre-service education, they also think it is better to fulfill the standard of present teacher's certificates and at the same time to make university authorities recognize those subjects. At this point, the university faculty seem to have the recognition that there are some limits in university to teach the practical educational technique which is the needs of schools. Nevertheless, it is certain that to evade improvement of contents of the curriculum concerning student guidance is impossible. Therefore as one way to fulfill educational contents, it might become the point to reach an agreement among university faculty, i.e. how and even what level they can (or make an effort to) educate students in university about the practical leadership concerning guidance.