The Prehistory of Corporations and Conspiracy in International Criminal Law: What Nuremberg Really Said

Among the most important questions in international criminal law since the mid-1990s have been the status of Anglo-American conspiracy law and the liability of corporations and their officers for human rights violations. These two issues have arisen in a broad range of settings, including Alien Tort...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inColumbia law review Vol. 109; no. 5; pp. 1094 - 1262
Main Author Bush, Jonathan A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Columbia University School of Law 01.06.2009
Subjects
Business history
Conspiracy
Crimes against humanity
Criminal conspiracy
Defendants
Essay
Genocide
Industrialists
International conspiracies
International criminal law
Liability
Memoranda
Multinational enterprises
Nazism
Nuremberg Trials
Organizations
Prosecuting attorneys
Trials
War crimes
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Among the most important questions in international criminal law since the mid-1990s have been the status of Anglo-American conspiracy law and the liability of corporations and their officers for human rights violations. These two issues have arisen in a broad range of settings, including Alien Tort Statute suits, cases arising out of the American detentions at Guantanamo Bay, and in the various international criminal tribunals at The Hague. The cases and jurists have, despite their otherwise diverse answers, agreed that the Nuremberg trials after World War II are the most important precedent. This Essay examines the five Nuremberg cases that featured economic perpetrators and the legal theories used there. The Essay focuses on the forgotten, crucial months between the first Nuremberg trial (1945-46) and the later twelve trials (1946-49), when theories of corporate and conspiracy liability were considered and debated. Using unpublished memos, letters, and diaries, the Essay concludes that conspiracy was seen to be a vital part of international law, albeit mainly for its evidentiary advantages, and that criminal charges against corporations were considered en- tirely permissible, though ultimately not used. The Essay also shows that other legal concepts, including genocide and crimes against humanity, were used against economic perpetrators. The Essay concludes by reprinting a sample of documents by such key figures as Robert H. Jackson, Telford Taylor, and Raphael Lemkin.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0010-1958
1945-2268