Mental Models for Scientists Communicating With the Public

Morgan and Fischhoff discuss the challenges faced by scientists in effectively communicating with the public and the need for a better approach to bridge the gap between scientific knowledge and public understanding. Over the years, scientists have made remarkable contributions but often feel unappr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIssues in science and technology Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 58 - 61
Main Authors MORGAN, KARA, FISCHHOFF, BARUCH
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Arizona Board of Regents for Arizona State University 01.12.2023
Issues in Science and Technology
Subjects
Agricultural Skills
Audiences
College Science
Communication
Communication (Thought Transfer)
COVID-19
COVID-19 vaccines
Decision Making
Evidence Based Practice
Experts
False information
FEATURES
Information Needs
Outdoor Education
Policy making
Psychological Studies
Radon
Risk communication
Science education
Science Instruction
Scientific and Technical Information
Scientific knowledge
Scientific Principles
Scientists
Skill development
Teaching
Trust
Trust (Psychology)
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0748-5492
1938-1557

Cover

More Information
Summary:Morgan and Fischhoff discuss the challenges faced by scientists in effectively communicating with the public and the need for a better approach to bridge the gap between scientific knowledge and public understanding. Over the years, scientists have made remarkable contributions but often feel unappreciated due to a lack of trust from the public and policymakers. They emphasize the need for a shift from the "deficit model" (which assumes the public lacks knowledge) to the "dialogue model" (focused on two-way communication). One effective approach for communicating science is risk communication, which involves presenting scientific information in a relatable way to help individuals make informed decisions about potential risks. This model requires ongoing dialogue with the public to understand their concerns and adapt messages accordingly. They also tackle three key barriers hindering effective communication: scientists are trained to communicate with other experts, not the public; teaching experience doesn't prepare scientists to engage with non-experts; and scientific disciplines often work in isolation, while risk communication requires interdisciplinary collaboration.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Commentary-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0748-5492
1938-1557