Determination of Conjugated-Estrogens in Wastewater by LC/MS/MS

In order to investigate the behaviors of transformation of conjugated estrogens (CEs) to free estrogens [FEs; estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), estriol (E3)] in wastewater, it is necessary to determine not only FEs but also CEs. Previously, we reported a procedure for determination both of FEs and C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH Vol. 42; pp. 265 - 276
Main Authors TANAKA, Hiroaki, OHIWA, Toshio, TANABE, Kaoru, KOMORI, Koya, SUEOKA, Minekazu, SUZUKI, Yutaka
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Japanese
Published Japan Society of Civil Engineers 2005
公益社団法人 土木学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1341-5115
1884-829X
DOI10.11532/proes1992.42.265

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In order to investigate the behaviors of transformation of conjugated estrogens (CEs) to free estrogens [FEs; estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), estriol (E3)] in wastewater, it is necessary to determine not only FEs but also CEs. Previously, we reported a procedure for determination both of FEs and CEs in wastewater by liquid chromatograph/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). But the recovery ratio of CEs was particularly low for glucuronated estrogens (GEs)(less than 30%). In order to overcome, we improved a pretreatment procedure and a subsequent separation by liquid chromatography (LC). This paper explains an improved analytical method for quantifying CEs in wastewater using LC/MS/MS. After addition of an ion-pair reagent and surrogates (E2-3S-d4 and E2-17G-13C4) to the sample, solid phase extraction (SPE) was performed using Oasis HLB cartridge. Subsequently, the cartridge was washed with ethyl acetate/n-hexane solution and eluted with ethyl acetate/methanol solution containing 0.05% ammonia. After solvent removal, the residue was dissolved in acetonitril/water solution, which was then analyzed by LC/MS/MS.(SRM-negative ions with electro splay ionization). the LC-mobil phase used in the gradient mode was acetonitril/water containing 10 mmol·L-1 formic acid. For quantification the added surrogates served as internal standards (E2-3S-d4 for SEs and E2-17G-13C4 for GEs, respectively). Applying this method, the method detection limit (MDL) of four sulfated estrogens (SEs) ranged from 0.6 to 1.2 ng·L-1 and five GEs ranged from 2.9 to 3.9 ng·L-1. The obtained recovery efficiencies ranged from 80 to 110% for SEs and 60 to 120% for GEs, respectively.
ISSN:1341-5115
1884-829X
DOI:10.11532/proes1992.42.265