Evaluation of the Accuracy of Relaxation Time Measurements Using 3D-QALAS at 3.0 T MRI and Comparison with 2D-MDME

• Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology Vol. 79; no. 7; pp. 663 - 673
• Main Authors: Fukunaga, Kota, Enzaki, Masahiro, Komi, Masanori, Azuma, Minako, Hirai, Toshinori, Fujiwara, Yasuhiro
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Japanese
• Published: Japan Japanese Society of Radiological Technology 20.07.2023; Japan Science and Technology Agency
• Subjects: Accuracy; Evaluation; Inversion; Magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Parenchyma; Proton density (concentration); quantitative MRI; Recovery; Relaxation time; synthetic MRI; three-dimensional imaging; Time measurement; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); quantitative MRI; relaxation time; synthetic MRI; three-dimensional imaging
• ISSN: 0369-4305; 1881-4883
• DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2023-1343

Purpose: Three-dimensional (3D) quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with a T2 preparation pulse (QALAS) is a quantitative sequence used to measure relaxation times. The accuracy of the relaxation time measurement of 3D-QALAS at 3.0 T and the bias of 3D-QALAS have not yet been assessed. The purpose of this study was to clarify the accuracy of the relaxation time measurements using 3D-QALAS at 3.0 T MRI. Methods: The accuracy of the T1 and T2 values for 3D-QALAS was evaluated using a phantom. Subsequently, the T1 and T2 values and proton density of the brain parenchyma in healthy subjects were measured using 3D-QALAS and compared with those of 2D multi-dynamic multi-echo (MDME). Results: In the phantom study, the average T1 value of 3D-QALAS was 8.3% prolonged than that for conventional inversion recovery spin-echo; the average T2 value for 3D-QALAS was 18.4% shorter than that for multi-echo spin-echo. The in vivo assessment showed that the mean T1 and T2 values and PD for 3D-QALAS were prolonged by 5.3%, shortened by 9.6%, and increased by 7.0%, respectively, compared with those for 2D-MDME. Conclusion: Although 3D-QALAS at 3.0 T has high accuracy T1 value, which is less than 1000 ms, the T1 value could be overestimated for tissues with it longer than that T1 value. The T2 value for 3D-QALAS could be underestimated for tissues with T2 values, and this tendency increases with longer T2 values.