Clinical significance of phosphaturia

• Published in: Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi Vol. 80; no. 5; p. 700
• Main Authors: Tozuka, K, Ishikawa, S, Morita, T, Kobayashi, Y, Ishiyama, S, Tokue, A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Japanese
• Published: Japan 01.05.1989
• Subjects: Adult; Calcium Phosphates - urine; Female; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Male; Middle Aged; Urinary Calculi - etiology; Urinary Calculi - urine; Urinary Tract Infections - urine
• ISSN: 0021-5287
• DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.80.700

From September 1986 to August 1987, heavy precipitation of amorphous calcium phosphate, that is phosphaturia, was found at our outpatient clinic in 153 postprandial urine specimens from 115 patients, in 1.5% of all the specimens examined during this period. One patient was excluded because he had both urolithiasis and urinary tract infection. The remaining 152 specimens with phosphaturia were then divided into 3 groups; Group I from patients with urolithiasis, Group II from patients with urinary tract infection and Group III from patients without either urolithiasis or urinary tract infection (Phosphaturia Group, Table 1). It is evident from this table that phosphaturia is repeated more frequently in patients with urolithiasis than in patients without urolithiasis (p less than 0.01). 200 urine specimens examined during this period were selected randomly. Three bloody or purulent specimens were excluded. The remaining 197 specimens from 189 patients were divided into 3 groups, as in the phosphaturia group (Control Group, Table 2). When the proportion of the number of specimens to the total is compared between the phosphaturia group and the control group, it is clear that phosphaturia is found more frequently in specimens from patients with urolithiasis than in specimens from patients without urolithiasis (p less than 0.01). Since phosphaturia was almost always found in the specimens with urine pH greater than or equal to 7, 486 patients, in whom the pH of the first urine specimen was equal to or above 7, were selected from among 1434 patients undergoing urinalyses during this period and divided into 3 groups as has been described above (Table 3).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)