HARD: Hardening Real-Time Scheduling and Analysis for Accelerator Enabled Computing

Despite the advancements in supporting artificial intelligence, accelerator-enabled computing architectures still struggle to meet strict timing constraints due to the complex interactions between CPU cores and accelerators. Although various scheduling and response-time analysis techniques have been...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings / IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium pp. 389 - 401
Main Authors Ni, Yinchen, Ma, Tianrui, Chen, Jintao, Yang, Chongye, Ye, Siwei, Xu, Yuankai, Jin, Yier, Zou, An
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 06.05.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite the advancements in supporting artificial intelligence, accelerator-enabled computing architectures still struggle to meet strict timing constraints due to the complex interactions between CPU cores and accelerators. Although various scheduling and response-time analysis techniques have been developed, a significant gap remains between the conservative hard real-time schedulability (i.e., worst-case response times) and the average measured schedulability on real systems. This pessimism significantly limits the deployment of hard real-time tasks on accelerator-enabled computing platforms. To address this, we propose HARD, a real-time scheduling approach that integrates scheduling strategies, response time analysis, and practical scheduler designs for general accelerator-enabled computing platforms. Benefiting the subtask level segmented characteristics that are ignored by classic schedulers, the proposed HARD can significantly improve the theoretically guaranteed hard real-time schedulability. Extensive experiments on off-the-shelf Intel CPUs and NVIDIA GPUs show that HARD outperforms state-of-the-art scheduling and analysis approaches, delivering a 11.3% improvement in hard real-time schedulability and a remarkable 45.1 % reduction in pessimism.
ISSN:2642-7346
DOI:10.1109/RTAS65571.2025.00043