P-608: Can drug-compliance and blood pressure control be improved by self-measurement and electronic reminders?

We have recently reported that electronic drug monitoring allows to identify a patient group with poor compliance between clinic visits (“white-coat compliance”). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of a combined intervention strategy on electronically monitored compliance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of hypertension Vol. 14; no. S1; p. 233A
Main Authors Mengden, T., Köhler, C., Uen, S., Weisser, B., Vetter, H., Düsing, R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.04.2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We have recently reported that electronic drug monitoring allows to identify a patient group with poor compliance between clinic visits (“white-coat compliance”). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of a combined intervention strategy on electronically monitored compliance and ambulatory 24-h-blood pressure measurement (ABPM) in patients with poor compliance. 48 treated patients with essential hypertension with a mean age of 57 years (29-83) were included. Day-to-day drug compliance (correct number and dose interval in %) was monitored with electronic pill boxes (eDEM, Aardex, Switzerland) over a period of 24 weeks. After 6 and 24 weeks weeks ABPM was performed with the Spacelabs 90207 monitor and mean BP values over the whole 24 h period were used for analysis. After 6 weeks patients with poor compliance (<90%) were instructed in self blood pressure measurement (Omron IC system). Furthermore, adherence to daily self-measurement and drug intake was reinforced by accoustic reminders (Omron IC system) and digital displays on the electronic pill boxes. The main results are given in the table (# p<0,001 before vs after intervention) Before intervention After intervention Compliance ABPM (mmHg) Compliance ABPM (mmHg) 97 ±4 % 134 ± 13 / 96 ± 4 % 133 ± 14 (n=23) 81 ± 9 (n.s.) 81 ± 10 (n.s.) 64 ±26 % 131 ± 11 / 86 ± 16 % 132 ± 11 / (n=20) 80 ± 8 (#) 81 ± 8 (n.s.) Determinants of compliance such as age, duration of hypertension and number of antihypertensive drugs were similar in good and poor compliers. Electronically monitored compliance can substantially by improved by self-management techniques and electronic reminders. Due to the effect of “white-coat”-compliance on days of clinic visits this did not affect blood control as assessed by ABPM.
Bibliography:istex:33B02E31C4204EC408880E33FB30F75DA259DF01
ark:/67375/HXZ-31Q7BB8T-F
href:14_S1_233A.pdf
ISSN:0895-7061
1941-7225
1879-1905
DOI:10.1016/S0895-7061(01)01915-X