Design and benchmarking of BCPMOS versus SCPMOS for an evolutionary 0.25-/spl mu/m CMOS technology

TCAD tools were used to design and benchmark 0.25-/spl mu/m buried-channel PMOS (BCPMOS) versus surface-channel PMOS (SCPMOS), for both device and circuit performance. With optimized device designs, BCPMOS gives smaller gate delays than SCPMOS for INVERTER and NAND gates with supply voltages V/sub D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on electron devices Vol. 45; no. 4; pp. 991 - 993
Main Authors Vuong, H.-H., Eshraghi, S.A., Rafferty, C.S., Hillenius, S.J., Pinto, M.R., Diodato, P.W., Cong, H.-I., Zeitzoff, P.M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.04.1998
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:TCAD tools were used to design and benchmark 0.25-/spl mu/m buried-channel PMOS (BCPMOS) versus surface-channel PMOS (SCPMOS), for both device and circuit performance. With optimized device designs, BCPMOS gives smaller gate delays than SCPMOS for INVERTER and NAND gates with supply voltages V/sub DD/>1.4 V, and for NOR gates with V/sub DD/>2.4 V.
ISSN:0018-9383
1557-9646
DOI:10.1109/16.662818