Sperm competition and the coevolution of pre- and postcopulatory traits: Weapons evolve faster than testes among onthophagine dung beetles

Reproductive competition generates episodes of both pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection. Theoretical models of sperm competition predict that as the fitness gains from expenditure on the weapons of male combat increase, males should increase their expenditure on weapons and decrease their expen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEvolution Vol. 70; no. 5; pp. 998 - 1008
Main Authors Simmons, Leigh W., Fitzpatrick, John L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2016
Society for the Study of Evolution
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Reproductive competition generates episodes of both pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection. Theoretical models of sperm competition predict that as the fitness gains from expenditure on the weapons of male combat increase, males should increase their expenditure on weapons and decrease their expenditure on traits that contribute to competitive fertilization success. Although traits subject to sexual selection are known to have accelerated evolutionary rates of phenotypic divergence, it is not known whether the competing demands of investment into pre- and postcopulatory traits affect their relative rates of evolutionary divergence. We use a comparative approach to estimate the rates of divergence in pre- and postcopulatory traits among onthophagine dung beetles. Weapons evolved faster than body size while testes mass and sperm length evolved more slowly than body size, suggesting that precopulatory competition is the stronger episode of sexual selection acting on these beetles. Although horns evolved faster than testes, evolutionary increases in horn length were not associated with evolutionary reductions in testes mass. Our data for onthophagines support the notion that in taxa where males are unable to monopolize paternity, expenditure on both weapons and testes should both be favored.
Bibliography:istex:18299324B6C56A4843C48D8B5369E49E98A6E107
ArticleID:EVO12915
ark:/67375/WNG-3SDMFT21-8
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0014-3820
1558-5646
1558-5646
DOI:10.1111/evo.12915