The architecture of river networks can drive the evolutionary dynamics of aquatic populations
It is widely recognized that physical landscapes can shape genetic variation within and between populations. However, it is not well understood how riverscapes, with their complex architectures, affect patterns of neutral genetic diversity. Using a spatially explicit agent-based modeling (ABM) appro...
Saved in:
Published in | Evolution Vol. 70; no. 3; pp. 731 - 739 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2016
Society for the Study of Evolution Oxford University Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | It is widely recognized that physical landscapes can shape genetic variation within and between populations. However, it is not well understood how riverscapes, with their complex architectures, affect patterns of neutral genetic diversity. Using a spatially explicit agent-based modeling (ABM) approach, we evaluate the genetic consequences of dendritic river shapes on local population structure. We disentangle the relative contribution of specific river properties to observed patterns of genetic variation by evaluating how different branching architectures and downstream flow regimes affect the genetic structure of populations situated within river networks. Irrespective of the river length, our results illustrate that the extent of river branching, confluence position, and levels of asymmetric downstream migration dictate patterns of genetic variation in riverine populations. Comparisons between simple and highly branched rivers show a 20-fold increase in the overall genetic diversity and a sevenfold increase in the genetic differentiation between local populations. Given that most rivers have complex architectures, these results highlight the importance of incorporating riverscape information into evolutionary models of aquatic species and could help explain why riverine fishes represent a disproportionately large amount of global vertebrate diversity per unit of habitable area. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:EVO12883 istex:2E063EC42B83555B8D8EB209079CD6D2F1699435 ark:/67375/WNG-2L21ZJHV-N Text 1. Discussion on parameter choice and, scalability and computation. Figure S1. Comparison between different values of per population carrying capacity (K) and number of offspring. Figure S2. Absolute and standardized genetic diversity, and genetic differentiation comparison between a river with constant carrying capacity (K) and varying K according the position of the population along the river. Figure S3. Genetic diversity and differentiation comparison between open landscapes and riverine network with symmetric and asymmetric migration, respectively. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0014-3820 1558-5646 1558-5646 |
DOI: | 10.1111/evo.12883 |