Interleukin-2 gene expression in different phases of episodic cluster headache - a pilot study

Steinberg A, Sjöstrand C, Sominanda A, Fogdell‐Hahn A, Nilsson Remahl AIM. Interleukin‐2 gene expression in different phases of episodic cluster headache – a pilot study.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2011: 124: 130–134.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Background – The pathophysiology of cluster headache (CH...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa neurologica Scandinavica Vol. 124; no. 2; pp. 130 - 134
Main Authors Steinberg, A., Sjöstrand, C., Sominanda, A., Fogdell-Hahn, A., Nilsson Remahl, A. I. M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2011
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Steinberg A, Sjöstrand C, Sominanda A, Fogdell‐Hahn A, Nilsson Remahl AIM. Interleukin‐2 gene expression in different phases of episodic cluster headache – a pilot study.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2011: 124: 130–134.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Background – The pathophysiology of cluster headache (CH) is still largely unknown. Immunological mechanisms have been suggested to be of importance. Aim – This study aimed to investigate cytokine interleukin‐2 (IL‐2) as a possible marker of immune system involvement in the pathophysiology of CH. Methods – Eight episodic patients with CH and 16 healthy headache‐free control subjects matched for age and gender were studied. Venous blood samples were drawn from the patients with CH on three occasions; during active period between headache attacks, during an attack and in remission. Venous blood samples were drawn once from each control subject. We analysed IL‐2 gene expression, using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Results –  Patients with CH had significantly increased relative IL‐2 gene expression levels between headache attacks during active CH period (median 9.9 IL‐2 cDNA/glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA; IQR 6.2–10.3) compared to during attacks (median 2.8; IQR 0.7–3.2, P = 0.012), remission (median 1.6; IQR 0.9–1.8, P = 0.017) and controls (median 0.9; IQR 0.6–1.9, P = 0.0001). Conclusion –  The increment of IL‐2 found during the active CH period may support a role for this cytokine and subsequently for the immune system in the pathophysiology of CH. An expansion of this study to a broader group of cytokines and a larger patient cohort is warranted.
Bibliography:istex:4FA9EF5D50B600C4CFD23DF4093D1DC1284F8B8D
ArticleID:ANE1434
ark:/67375/WNG-SV0F285Z-5
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0001-6314
1600-0404
1600-0404
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01434.x