Possible Association Between OPRM1 Genetic Variance at the 118 Locus and Alcohol Dependence in a Large Treatment Sample: Relationship to Alcohol Dependence Symptoms

Background Several lines of evidence from previous research indicate that opioid receptors play an important role in ethanol reinforcement and alcohol dependence (AD) risk. Conflicting results were reported on the role of the mu‐opioid receptor (OPRM1) polymorphism A118G (Asn40Asp, rs1799971) in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research Vol. 36; no. 7; pp. 1230 - 1236
Main Authors Koller, Gabriele, Zill, Peter, Rujescu, Dan, Ridinger, Monika, Pogarell, Oliver, Fehr, Christoph, Wodarz, Norbert, Bondy, Brigitta, Soyka, Michael, Preuss, Ulrich W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2012
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Several lines of evidence from previous research indicate that opioid receptors play an important role in ethanol reinforcement and alcohol dependence (AD) risk. Conflicting results were reported on the role of the mu‐opioid receptor (OPRM1) polymorphism A118G (Asn40Asp, rs1799971) in the development of alcoholism. Methods We investigated a total number of 1,845 alcohol‐dependent subjects recruited from inpatient facilities in Germany and 1,863 controls for the mu‐opioid receptor (OPRM1) polymorphism using chi‐square statistics. Results An association between the OPRM variant and AD was detected (p = 0.022), in recessive (AA vs. GA/GG) and co‐dominant (AA vs. GA) models of inheritance. An association between the OPRM variant and the DSM‐IV criterion “efforts to cut down or could not” (p = 0.047) was found, but this did not remain significant after the correction for multiple testing. Conclusions The results indicate that this functional OPRM variant is associated with risk of AD and these findings apply to more severe AD, although the association is only nominally significant.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ACER1714
istex:BB10324C638A0B6B0C6CB348D700DFF4C955C7B4
ark:/67375/WNG-2KHR3JLX-6
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0145-6008
1530-0277
1530-0277
DOI:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01714.x