A Biomechanical Evaluation of a Hybrid Dynamic Compression Plate and a CastLess Arthrodesis Plate for Pancarpal Arthrodesis in Dogs

Objective To determine mechanical differences between two plates with different requirements for supplementary casting after pancarpal arthrodesis (PCA): the Veterinary Instrumentation Hybrid Dynamic Compression Plate (HDCP), and the OrthoMed CastLess Arthrodesis Plate (CLP). Study Design In vitro m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVeterinary surgery Vol. 41; no. 6; pp. 738 - 744
Main Authors Meeson, Richard L., Goodship, Allen E., Arthurs, Gareth I.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To determine mechanical differences between two plates with different requirements for supplementary casting after pancarpal arthrodesis (PCA): the Veterinary Instrumentation Hybrid Dynamic Compression Plate (HDCP), and the OrthoMed CastLess Arthrodesis Plate (CLP). Study Design In vitro mechanical analysis. Sample Population HDCP(n = 10), CLP(10). Methods Single‐cycle load to failure using a materials‐testing machine and cyclic loading between 38 and 380 N ± 5% to simulate estimated in vivo loads until failure or 106 cycles. Results Single‐cycle to failure: bending stiffness was significantly higher for the HDCP(2269 ± 175 N/mm) than CLP(1754 ± 88 N/mm; P < .001). Bending structural stiffness was higher for the HDCP(3.8 ± 0.3 Nm2) versus CLP(2.9 ± 0.2 Nm2; P= .0022). A difference between the 2 plates for bending strength was not demonstrated; HDCP= 13.9 ± 1.4 Nm, CLP13.2 ± 0.5 Nm (P= .24). Cyclic Loading: no failures occurred with either plate type when plates were cycled to 106 cycles. Conclusion There is no mechanical advantage in bending resistance afforded by the CLPover the HDCP. Fatigue failure of either plate during the convalescent period of an estimated 150,000–250,000 cycles is unlikely. Based on the bending performance, there is no evidence to support the use of the CLPover the HDCPfor castless PCA.
Bibliography:istex:CE91921BAA0C439A4F396E50935E3C0FF6679A81
ark:/67375/WNG-C9WFHZT6-N
British Veterinary Orthopaedic Association
ArticleID:VSU985
Presented in part at the BVOA Spring Scientific Meeting, Birmingham, UK, 2011
Work conducted at the Musculoskeletal Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-3499
1532-950X
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.00985.x