A projection of ozone-induced wheat production loss in China and India for the years 2000 and 2020 with exposure-based and flux-based approaches

Using a high‐resolution (40 × 40 km) chemical transport model coupled with the Regional Emission inventory in Asia (REAS), we simulated surface ozone concentrations ([O3]) and evaluated O3‐induced wheat production loss in China and India for the years 2000 and 2020 using dose–response functions base...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal change biology Vol. 19; no. 9; pp. 2739 - 2752
Main Authors Tang, Haoye, Takigawa, Masayuki, Liu, Gang, Zhu, Jianguo, Kobayashi, Kazuhiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2013
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Using a high‐resolution (40 × 40 km) chemical transport model coupled with the Regional Emission inventory in Asia (REAS), we simulated surface ozone concentrations ([O3]) and evaluated O3‐induced wheat production loss in China and India for the years 2000 and 2020 using dose–response functions based on AOT40 (accumulated [O3] above 40 ppb) and PODY (phytotoxic O3 dose, accumulated stomatal flux of O3 above a threshold of Y nmol m−2 s−1). Two O3 dose metrics (90 days AOT40 and POD6) were derived from European experiments, and the other two (75 days AOT40 and POD12) were adapted from Asian studies. Relative yield loss (RYL) of wheat in 2000 was estimated to be 6.4–14.9% for China and 8.2–22.3% for India. POD6 predicted greater RYL, especially for the warm regions of India, whereas the 90 days AOT40 gave the lowest estimates. For the future projection, all the O3 dose metrics gave comparable estimates of an increase in RYL from 2000 to 2020 in the range 8.1–9.4% and 5.4–7.7% for China and India, respectively. The lower projected increase in RYL for India may be due to conservative estimation of the emission increase in 2020. Sensitivity tests of the model showed that the PODY‐based estimates of RYL are highly sensitive to perturbations in the meteorological inputs, but that the estimated increase in RYL from 2000 to 2020 is much more robust. The projected increase in wheat production loss in China and India in the near future is substantially larger than the uncertainties in the estimation and indicates an urgent need for curbing the rapid increase in surface [O3] in these regions.
Bibliography:ArticleID:GCB12252
Data S1. Model evaluation against surface ozone observations in China and India.Figure S1. Comparisons between monthly simulated [O3] (lines) for the year 2000 and measured [O3] (dots) in each defined region. Monthly simulated values are averaged over the grid cells where the observational sites are located. The measured values and error bars represent the means and ±1 SD of the monthly [O3] of the observational sites within each region.Table S1. Wheat production loss and relative yield loss in the year 2000 estimated by different O3 dose metrics for each province of China.Table S2. Wheat production loss and relative yield loss in the year 2020 estimated by different O3 dose metrics for each province of China.Table S3. Wheat production loss and relative yield loss in the year 2000 estimated by different O3 dose metrics for each state of India.Table S4. Wheat production loss and relative yield loss in the year 2020 estimated by different O3 dose metrics for each state of India.Table S5. List of the regional boundaries, number of observation sites, and the data sources of the observed [O3] for each defined region.
istex:98D9B37BC6445057B9F75D1C92249FD559C4BEFA
Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences - No. KZCX2-EW-414, ISSASIP1112
the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the Global Environment Research Fund - No. C-062
RONPAKU Fellowship - No. CAS-11012
ark:/67375/WNG-PKRJW9R7-G
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ISSN:1354-1013
1365-2486
DOI:10.1111/gcb.12252