Lipid transfer proteins: the most frequent sensitizer in Italian subjects with food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis

Summary Background Specific food‐dependent exercise‐induced anaphylaxis (S‐FDEIAn) is a distinct form of food allergy in which symptoms are elicited by exercise performed after ingesting food to which the patient has become sensitised. Non‐specific FDEIAn (NS‐FDEIAn) is a syndrome provoked by exerci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and experimental allergy Vol. 42; no. 11; pp. 1643 - 1653
Main Authors Romano, A., Scala, E., Rumi, G., Gaeta, F., Caruso, C., Alonzi, C., Maggioletti, M., Ferrara, R., Palazzo, P., Palmieri, V., Zeppilli, P., Mari, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2012
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background Specific food‐dependent exercise‐induced anaphylaxis (S‐FDEIAn) is a distinct form of food allergy in which symptoms are elicited by exercise performed after ingesting food to which the patient has become sensitised. Non‐specific FDEIAn (NS‐FDEIAn) is a syndrome provoked by exercise performed after ingesting any food. Objective We sought to identify the culprit allergenic molecules in patients with FDEIAn, combining ‘classic’ allergy testing with an allergenic molecule‐based microarray approach for IgE detection. Methods All subjects were evaluated who reported at least one episode of anaphylaxis in association with physical exercise performed within 4 h after a meal. We performed skin prick tests (SPT) with commercial food extracts, prick plus prick tests (P + P) with fresh foods (P + P), and serum specific IgE assays by means of both the ImmunoCAP (CAP) and the ISAC 89 microarray system (ISAC). Results Among our 82 FDEIAn patients, the most frequent suspected foods were tomato, cereals, and peanut. SPT, P + P, and CAP displayed different degrees of sensitivity. Each test disclosed some positivities not discovered by others. Seventy‐nine subjects were positive to at least one food (49 to more than 20), whereas three were negative. All suspected foods were positive to at least one of SPT, P + P, and CAP. When tested using the ISAC, 64 (78%) subjects were positive to Pru p 3 [peach lipid transfer protein (LTP)], 13 were positive to other food allergen molecules, and five displayed negative results to all food allergenic molecules. Overall, 79 patients probably had S‐FDEIAn and the other 3 NS‐FDEIAn. Conclusions Multiple food hypersensitivity represents a clinical hallmark of a large percentage of FDEIAn patients. The very high prevalence of IgE to the LTP suggests a role of this allergen group in causing S‐FDEIAn.
Bibliography:istex:648C7D22C448A306421F535F89EB315140E25008
ArticleID:CEA12011
ark:/67375/WNG-FNG8MMZP-7
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0954-7894
1365-2222
1365-2222
DOI:10.1111/cea.12011