Identifications of ancient Egyptian royal mummies from the 18th Dynasty reconsidered

ABSTRACT For centuries, ancient Egyptian Royal mummies have drawn the attention both of the general public and scientists. Many royal mummies from the New Kingdom have survived. The discoveries of the bodies of these ancient rulers have always sparked much attention, yet not all identifications are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of physical anthropology Vol. 159; no. S61; pp. 216 - 231
Main Authors Habicht, M.E., Bouwman, A.S., Rühli, F.J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT For centuries, ancient Egyptian Royal mummies have drawn the attention both of the general public and scientists. Many royal mummies from the New Kingdom have survived. The discoveries of the bodies of these ancient rulers have always sparked much attention, yet not all identifications are clear even nowadays. This study presents a meta‐analysis to demonstrate the difficulties in identifying ancient Egyptian royal mummies. Various methods and pitfalls in the identification of the Pharaohs are reassessed since new scientific methods can be used, such as ancient DNA‐profiling and CT‐scanning. While the ancestors of Tutankhamun have been identified, some identities are still highly controversial (e.g., the mystery of the KV‐55 skeleton, recently most likely identified as the genetic father of Tutankhamun). The meta‐analysis confirms the suggested identity of some mummies (e.g., Amenhotep III, Thutmosis IV, and Queen Tjye). Am J Phys Anthropol 159:S216–S231, 2016. © 2016 American Association of Physical Anthropologists
Bibliography:The Cogito Foundation Zurich
istex:C72E1CEEE97EAC7E0B252161856B3C09BBA9B4A3
ArticleID:AJPA22909
Mäxi Foundation Zurich
ark:/67375/WNG-KTH57ZDS-T
The original article published online 25 January 2016. The article has since been changed and has been uploaded online with Supporting Information.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0002-9483
1096-8644
2692-7691
DOI:10.1002/ajpa.22909