Does allogrooming serve a hygienic function in Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus?

• Published in: American journal of primatology Vol. 49; no. 3; pp. 223 - 242
• Main Authors: Pérez Pérez, Ana, Josep Veà Baró, Joaquim
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.1999
• Subjects: Africa; allogrooming; Animals; Body Surface Area - veterinary; Cercocebus; Cercocebus - physiology; function; Functional analysis; Grooming - physiology; Hygiene; Old World monkeys; Primates; Primatology; Social behaviour
• ISSN: 0275-2565; 1098-2345
• DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(199911)49:3<223::AID-AJP2>3.0.CO;2-9

To test the hygienic functional hypothesis of allogrooming in the white‐crowned mangabey (Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus), we analyzed the distribution of such behavior over the body surface in the individuals of two captive groups of this species (N = 9 and N = 8). To sample the data, we used focal animal sampling and continuous recording. Before analyzing the data, we measured a representative subject in order to calculate the body surface area occupied by each site, defined accessibility rigorously (distinguishing among three categories of sites: easy to reach, difficult to reach, and inaccessible), and tested empirically the classification proposed. To determine whether allogrooming was likely to concentrate on the body sites with accessibility problems, we ran three successive analyses, each of with was increasingly specific: grouping types of sites, analyzing each site separately, and analyzing each subject's reception profile. The results obtained show that in both groups inaccessible sites received more allogrooming than predicted by their actual surface area; sites that were difficult to reach received an amount of allogrooming proportional to the body surface area they occupied, and those easy to reach received less allogrooming than expected. This complementarity between the distribution of auto‐ and allogrooming is consistent with the hygienic functional hypothesis of allogrooming. However, not all inaccessible sides nor those difficult‐to‐reach were allogroomed equally: Allogrooming concentrated primarily on dorsal and caudal regions, whose care is incompatible with a ventral/ventral orientation between groomer and groomee. The strong distributional selectivity of allogrooming and the interindividual variability in preferred allogrooming sites suggest that the hygienic functional hypothesis cannot fully account for all the aspects of the corporal distribution of such behavior. Thus, in support of the multifunctional nature of allogrooming, we conclude that there must be more than cleaning involved in Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus' allogrooming. Am. J. Primatol. 49:223–242, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.