CONTRAST AND STIMULUS GENERALIZATION FOLLOWING PROLONGED DISCRIMINATION TRAINING

Different groups of pigeons received discrimination training in which the reinforcement-associated and extinction-associated stimuli were respectively either (a) a line tilt vs a blank key, (b) a blank key vs a line tilt, or (c) two different line tilts. The high response rates that developed to the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior Vol. 15; no. 3; pp. 355 - 363
Main Author Hearst, Eliot
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.1971
Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Different groups of pigeons received discrimination training in which the reinforcement-associated and extinction-associated stimuli were respectively either (a) a line tilt vs a blank key, (b) a blank key vs a line tilt, or (c) two different line tilts. The high response rates that developed to the positive stimulus in all groups during discrimination learning were maintained over 64 sessions of training. After these sessions, all subjects were tested for stimulus generalization along the line-tilt dimension. Gradients of relative (per cent) generalization around the stimulus associated with reinforcement (so-called excitatory gradients) and around the stimulus associated with extinction (so-called inhibitory gradients) were as steep as they typically are after much briefer training periods. These results do not support several of Terrace's predictions on the basis of the hypothesis that emotional responses develop to the stimulus associated with extinction during discrimination learning with errors, but eventually dissipate after extended training.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-PLBRQFZP-0
ArticleID:JEAB385
istex:2B67030C533112FD9B48D6D6BEE8A866ABE6B4A8
The research connected with this article was supported mainly by NIMH Grant MH 12120. I thank Minnie Koresko, Leigh Shallenberger, and Carol Bergfeld for advice and assistance.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
The research connected with this article was supported mainly by NIMH Grant MH 12120. I thank Minnie Koresko, Leigh Shallenberger, and Carol Bergfeld for advice and assistance. Reprints may be obtained from the author, Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401.
ISSN:0022-5002
1938-3711
DOI:10.1901/jeab.1971.15-355