Overview of the use of dermoscopy in academic and non-academic hospital centres in France: a nationwide survey

Background Dermoscopy is acknowledged to improve the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma by several concordant meta‐analyses. However, the use of dermoscopy was not considered as a high level of evidence diagnostic tool by French Health Authorities. However, as shown in Australian, American and in our r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vol. 28; no. 9; pp. 1207 - 1213
Main Authors Breton, A.L., Amini-Adle, M., Duru, G., Poulalhon, N., Dalle, S., Thomas, L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Dermoscopy is acknowledged to improve the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma by several concordant meta‐analyses. However, the use of dermoscopy was not considered as a high level of evidence diagnostic tool by French Health Authorities. However, as shown in Australian, American and in our recent surveys, dermoscopy is used by most of dermatologists in private practice. Objectives To analyse the use, beliefs, teaching given and research produced in dermoscopy in dermatology departments of French hospitals. Methods A questionnaire about the use, available equipment, teaching activities and published research on dermoscopy was mailed to all chairmen of dermatology departments in French both academic and non‐academic hospitals. Results Seventy‐six of 110 mailed questionnaires were returned. The majority of centres claimed to use dermoscopy (97.5%), but it seemed heterogeneous among practitioners according to their age and position. The use of dermoscopy was four times higher in non‐academic centres (P = 0.015). Centres located in the south east of France were higher users comparing with others (P = 0.004). Earlier detection of melanoma was the most important advantage reported. Excessive training time was the most important reported disadvantage. Twenty‐five percent of centres had dedicated clinics for pigmented lesions. Few centres (14.5%) run formal dermoscopy training programs. Most centres (74.7%) declared a use of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of non‐tumoral diseases. Conclusions This is the first European study evaluating the use of dermoscopy among hospital. Despite a large use, dermoscopy‐dedicated teaching and research time appeared to be insufficient.
Bibliography:Lyon 1 University
ArticleID:JDV12260
ark:/67375/WNG-94474LW7-6
istex:D905375A9C3F8B7F41F820CEF00986A361A6BDEF
Hospices civils de Lyon
Ligue contre le cancer du Rhône
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.12260