Is P50 the most representative P(SO2) to evaluate HbO2 affinity?

Off-line computer assistance allowed a correct visualization of the actual data included in any experimental whole oxygen-hemoglobin association curve. The affinity of hemoglobin for oxygen (characterized by the successive PO2 corresponding to any saturation value: P(SO2)), the shape of the associat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScandinavian journal of clinical & laboratory investigation. Supplement Vol. 203; p. 155
Main Authors Volter, F, Uhart, N, Buvry, A, Mary, J Y
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Norway 1990
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Off-line computer assistance allowed a correct visualization of the actual data included in any experimental whole oxygen-hemoglobin association curve. The affinity of hemoglobin for oxygen (characterized by the successive PO2 corresponding to any saturation value: P(SO2)), the shape of the association curve (Hill's curve and Hill's numbers) and the Bohr coefficients all along the oxygenation process, were determined with great accuracy. Results agreed with literature values obtained for successive steps of oxygenation. A batch of 78 computerized curves was divided into 3 groups (normal: NL, right deviated: RD and left deviated: LD) to which the principal component (P.C.) method was applied. It was therefore possible not only to study correlations between any curve summarized by its P.C. and any external variable but also to define for any association curve, whatever its eventual shift, the most representative value of P(SO2). For all mixed groups, the most significant parameter would be P44. If the characterization of the HbO2 dissociation curve is to be represented by a single point, then it should be P48 for the NL curves, P52 for the LD group, and P24 for the RD group. Then, the common use of P50 appeared to be illegitimate and inadequate for the right shifted curves, a very frequent circumstance in clinical practice.
ISSN:0085-591X
2166-1030
DOI:10.3109/00365519009087505