Uncertainty Quantified Matrix Completion Using Bayesian Hierarchical Matrix Factorization

Low-rank matrix completion methods have been successful in a variety of settings such as recommendation systems. However, most of the existing matrix completion methods only provide a point estimate of missing entries, and do not characterize uncertainties of the predictions. In this paper, we propo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2014 13th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications pp. 312 - 317
Main Authors Fazayeli, Farideh, Banerjee, Arindam, Kattge, Jens, Schrodt, Franziska, Reich, Peter B.
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.12.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Low-rank matrix completion methods have been successful in a variety of settings such as recommendation systems. However, most of the existing matrix completion methods only provide a point estimate of missing entries, and do not characterize uncertainties of the predictions. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian hierarchical probabilistic matrix factorization (BHPMF) model to (1) incorporate hierarchical side information, and (2) provide uncertainty quantified predictions. The former yields significant performance improvements in the problem of plant trait prediction, a key problem in ecology, by leveraging the taxonomic hierarchy in the plant kingdom. The latter is helpful in identifying predictions of low confidence which can in turn be used to guide field work for data collection efforts. A Gibbs sampler is designed for inference in the model. Further, we propose a multiple inheritance BHPMF (MI-BHPMF) which can work with a general directed acyclic graph (DAG) structured hierarchy, rather than a tree. We present comprehensive experimental results on the problem of plant trait prediction using the largest database of plant traits, where BHPMF shows strong empirical performance in uncertainty quantified trait prediction, outperforming the state-of-the-art based on point estimates. Further, we show that BHPMF is more accurate when it is confident, whereas the error is high when the uncertainty is high.
DOI:10.1109/ICMLA.2014.56