Resistance to paraquat in Mazus pumilus

Summary Mazus pumilus is an annual self‐pollinating weed that is commonly found in arable land, vegetable gardens and roadsides. This weed harbours insects and pathogens that attack vegetables. The mechanism of resistance to paraquat of M. pumilus found in Ohita, Japan, was studied. Whole plant bioa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWeed research Vol. 53; no. 3; pp. 176 - 182
Main Authors Tsuji, K, Hosokawa, M, Morita, S, Miura, R, Tominaga, T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2013
Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Mazus pumilus is an annual self‐pollinating weed that is commonly found in arable land, vegetable gardens and roadsides. This weed harbours insects and pathogens that attack vegetables. The mechanism of resistance to paraquat of M. pumilus found in Ohita, Japan, was studied. Whole plant bioassays revealed that the resistant (R) biotypes were four to six times less susceptible than controls. Chlorophyll destruction of leaf discs by paraquat treatment in R biotypes was 4–20 times lower than those of susceptible (S) biotypes. Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) values in R biotypes were higher than those of S biotypes before and after paraquat treatments. The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) was also higher in R biotypes than those of S biotypes before and after treatment with paraquat, but the activities of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and catalase (CAT) were not different between R and S biotypes. Change of ascorbate (AsA) contents before and after paraquat treatment was equivalent in both biotypes. These results indicate that the increased SOD activity and antioxidant capacity in R biotypes contribute to the resistance to paraquat of M. pumilus.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-WC8VRXH4-9
istex:870D5DA48948D13009B1B883CC7EEAE99BAB34A1
ArticleID:WRE12012
ISSN:0043-1737
1365-3180
DOI:10.1111/wre.12012