'Where are you from?': Identifying place

Many social research projects, such as interviews, focus groups, and surveys, take local place as a given: they choose participants from a particular place, take this place as background for what the participants say, ask them about place-related issues, and correlate responses with different places...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of sociolinguistics Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 320 - 343
Main Author Myers, Greg
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK; Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc 01.06.2006
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many social research projects, such as interviews, focus groups, and surveys, take local place as a given: they choose participants from a particular place, take this place as background for what the participants say, ask them about place-related issues, and correlate responses with different places. But people can identify places in different ways, in geographical or relational terms, and in different levels of scale. This study analyses passages in focus groups in which participants say where they are from, shows that participants generally take the question and answer as routine, and then shows the ways the interaction develops when this routineness is broken, amended, or called into question. When a participant revises their statement of where they are from, they adapt to what they see as the knowledge and stance of their interlocutor, they re-present themselves, and they create possibilities for further talk, defending, telling stories, or showing entitlement to an opinion. I argue that the ways people answer this question, interactively, can tell us about them, and us, as well as about their map of the world. References. Adapted from the source document.
Bibliography:istex:CC2D6B06BB35A3C01E89AD2FBD08579B899124F6
ark:/67375/WNG-0W31DMV7-T
ArticleID:JOSL330
My thanks to the Åbo Akademi Foundation for the H. W. Donner Visiting Professorship that enabled me to complete this paper, and enjoy the research resources and colleagues of Åbo Akademi. An earlier version of these ideas was presented at the Colloquium 'Local Talk/Local Knowledge' at Sociolinguistics Symposium 2000. My thanks to Barbara Johnstone and the participants in that session. Revised versions were presented at Humanities Research Seminar at Åbo Akademi, and at the Research Unit for Variation and Change in English at the University of Helsinki. My examples are drawn from six research projects at the Centre for the Study of Environmental Change and the Institute for Environmental Philosophy and Public Policy, Lancaster University: 'Public Perceptions and Sustainability in Lancashire', funded by Lancashire County Council; 'Public Rhetorics of Sustainability', funded by U.K. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), grant number R000221347; 'Uncertain World: Genetically Modified Organisms, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain'(in association with Unilever); 'Global Citizenship and the Environment', also funded by the ESRC, grant number R000236768; 'The Front End of the Front End: Mapping Public Concerns about Radioactive Waste Management Issues', funded by Nirex; 'Animal Futures: Public Attitudes and Sensibilities towards Animals and Biotechnology in Contemporary Britain', funded by the U.K. Agriculture and Environmental Biotechnology Commission. Thanks to Jane Hunt, Phil Macnaghten, Peter Simmons, Bronislaw Szerszynski, Mark Toogood, John Urry, and Brian Wynne. Further details on the projects will be found at http://www.domino.lancs.ac.uk/ieppp/home.nsf
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1360-6441
1467-9841
DOI:10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00330.x