Brahms's Motivic Harmonies and Contemporary Tonal Theory: Three Case Studies from the Chamber Music

In his classic essay 'Issues in Composition', Carl Dahlhaus posits a dialectical relationship in Brahms between the function of harmony as a source for motivic 'individualisation' and as a basis for large-scale formal organisation. This dialectic may be profitably engaged in ligh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMusic analysis Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 63 - 110
Main Author Smith, Peter H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2009
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In his classic essay 'Issues in Composition', Carl Dahlhaus posits a dialectical relationship in Brahms between the function of harmony as a source for motivic 'individualisation' and as a basis for large-scale formal organisation. This dialectic may be profitably engaged in light of the current debate between Schenkerian and neo-Riemannian views of harmony, with Brahms's Sextet in G major, String Quartet in C minor and String Quintet in G major serving as analytical case studies. These case studies demonstrate the insights that both Schenkerian and neo-Riemannian perspectives might afford while drawing attention to the need to engage the two approaches critically to achieve a deeper analytical understanding. The analyses also underscore the importance of formal context and temporal perspective in evaluating harmonic relationships. The presence of tonally centred prolongational structures in no way denies the potential for neo-Riemannian perspectives to shed light on aspects of the development of Brahms's motivic harmonies. Parsimonious transformations in the motivic dimension likewise do not invalidate Schenkerian insights into each movement's rock-solid articulation of its tonality. Brahms's range of compositional strategies requires a flexible analytical response, sufficiently consistent to be by implication theoretically coherent, yet subtly differentiated in the specific Schenkerian and neo-Riemannian explorations.
Bibliography:istex:8C0607BD89D784EC6842D9DD21D7119DE1EDCC5A
ark:/67375/WNG-2G95KL4K-X
ArticleID:MUSA287
ISSN:0262-5245
1468-2249
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2249.2010.00287.x