Inhibitory effect of propofol on ketamine-induced c-Fos expression in the rat posterior cingulate and retrosplenial cortices is mediated by GABAA receptor activation

Background:  Non‐competitive N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, including ketamine, have psychotomimetic activities and cause neuronal damage in the posterior cingulate and retrosplenial cortices (PC/RS), which are suggested to be the brain regions responsible for their psychotomimeti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Vol. 47; no. 3; pp. 284 - 290
Main Authors Nakao, S., Nagata, A., Miyamoto, E., Masuzawa, M., Murayama, T., Shingu, K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Munksgaard International Publishers 01.03.2003
Blackwell
Subjects
Rat
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:  Non‐competitive N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, including ketamine, have psychotomimetic activities and cause neuronal damage in the posterior cingulate and retrosplenial cortices (PC/RS), which are suggested to be the brain regions responsible for their psychotomimetic activities. We previously demonstrated that ketamine induced marked c‐Fos (c‐fos protein) expression in the rat PC/RS, which was inhibited by propofol, and the expression was closely related to ketamine‐induced abnormal behavior. In the present study, we investigated whether the inhibition by propofol was mediated by GABAA receptor receptor activation. Methods:  Using Wistar rats, propofol alone, propofol with bicuculline or propofol with flumazenil was injected intravenously and then continuously infused. Fifteen minutes later, 100 mg kg−1 of ketamine or normal saline was injected intraperitoneally. Two hours after the ketamine or saline injection, the brain was extracted and brain sections were prepared, and c‐Fos expression was detected using immunohistochemical methods. Results:  Ketamine induced marked c‐Fos expression in the PC/RS (171 ± 9/0.4 mm2), which was significantly inhibited by propofol (5 ± 5/0.4 mm2). The inhibition by propofol was disinhibited dose‐dependently by both bicuculline (0.5 and 1.0 mg kg−1 bicuculline groups: 46 ± 15 and 143 ± 16, respectively) and flumazenil (0.1 and 1.0 mg kg−1 flumazenil groups: 79 ± 6 and 130 ± 15, respectively). Conclusion:  These results demonstrate that the inhibitory effect of propofol on ketamine‐induced c‐Fos expression in the PC/RS is mediated by GABAA receptor activation, and suggests that ketamine‐induced psychoneuronal adverse effects may be suppressed by propofol via the activation of GABAA receptors.
Bibliography:ArticleID:AAS040
ark:/67375/WNG-3PG3G3DR-H
istex:743C947B0DFDD7CE856191F33DE003AAF108F3A9
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-5172
1399-6576
DOI:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00040.x