Infinite horizon robustly stable seismic protection of cable-stayed bridges using cost cumulants
The basic idea behind infinite horizon state feedback k-cost-cumulant (kCC) control is to seek a constant state feedback law which minimizes the value of a finite linear combination of the first k cost cumulants of a traditional integral quadratic cost associated with a linear stochastic system, whe...
Saved in:
Published in | 2004 American Control Conference Proceedings; Volume 1 of 6 Vol. 1; pp. 691 - 696 vol.1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Conference Proceeding Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Piscataway NJ
IEEE
01.01.2004
Evanston IL American Automatic Control Council |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The basic idea behind infinite horizon state feedback k-cost-cumulant (kCC) control is to seek a constant state feedback law which minimizes the value of a finite linear combination of the first k cost cumulants of a traditional integral quadratic cost associated with a linear stochastic system, when there is no specification of a large terminal time. The paper begins with the development of matrix algebraic equations for the cost cumulants. These equations permit the incorporation of classes of linear feedback controllers for linear dynamical systems defined on infinite horizon. The infinite horizon control problem with the optimization goal of a finite linear combination of the first k cost cumulants is then stated. Because the control optimization problem at hand involves matrix equality constraints, the optimal feedback solution is investigated by utilizing a Lagrange multipliers technique. The efficacy and applicability of this control paradigm, based upon the first three cost cumulants, are demonstrated on the second earthquake generation benchmark for response control of cable-stayed bridges (Caicedo, J.M., et al., 2003). The simulation results indicate that the cost cumulants in the infinite horizon case offer significant improvements in robust stability margin while keeping comparable levels of structural performance when comparing to those of the baseline LQG in the benchmark. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-2 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Conference Paper-1 content type line 23 SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1 ObjectType-Article-3 |
ISBN: | 9780780383357 0780383354 |
ISSN: | 0743-1619 2378-5861 |
DOI: | 10.23919/ACC.2004.1383684 |