Spring uses in exoskeleton actuation design

An exoskeleton has to be lightweight, compliant, yet powerful to fulfill the demanding task of walking. This imposes a great challenge for the actuator design. Electric motors, by far the most common actuator in robotic, orthotic, and prosthetic devices, cannot provide sufficiently high peak and ave...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics Vol. 2011; pp. 1 - 6
Main Authors Shiqian Wang, van Dijk, W., van der Kooij, H.
Format Conference Proceeding Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.01.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN1424498635
9781424498635
ISSN1945-7898
1945-7901
1945-7901
DOI10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975471

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:An exoskeleton has to be lightweight, compliant, yet powerful to fulfill the demanding task of walking. This imposes a great challenge for the actuator design. Electric motors, by far the most common actuator in robotic, orthotic, and prosthetic devices, cannot provide sufficiently high peak and average power and force/torque output, and they normally require high-ratio, heavy reducer to produce the speeds and high torques needed for human locomotion. Studies on the human muscle-tendon system have shown that muscles (including tendons and ligaments) function as a spring, and by storing energy and releasing it at a proper moment, locomotion becomes more energy efficient. Inspired by the muscle behavior, we propose a novel actuation strategy for exoskeleton design. In this paper, the collected gait data are analyzed to identify the spring property of the human muscle-tendon system. Theoretical optimization results show that adding parallel springs can reduce the peak torque by 66%, 53%, and 48% for hip flexion/extension (F/E), hip abduction/adduction (A/A), and ankle dorsi/plantar flexion (D/PF), respectively, and the rms power by 50%, 45%, and 61%, respectively. Adding a series spring (forming a Series Elastic Actuator, SEA) reduces the peak power by 79% for ankle D/PF, and by 60% for hip A/A. A SEA does not reduce the peak power demand at other joints. The optimization approach can be used for designing other wearable robots as well.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISBN:1424498635
9781424498635
ISSN:1945-7898
1945-7901
1945-7901
DOI:10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975471