NONPRICE WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAMS AS A DEMAND MANAGEMENT TOOL

Water providers nationwide are implementing nonprice conservation measures such as education, public information, appliance retrofit and ordinances, with the expectation that these programs will reduce residential water demand. However, little empirical information exists on the effectiveness of non...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Water Resources Association Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 593 - 602
Main Authors Michelsen, An M., McGuckin, J. Thomas, Stumpf, Donna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.1999
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Water providers nationwide are implementing nonprice conservation measures such as education, public information, appliance retrofit and ordinances, with the expectation that these programs will reduce residential water demand. However, little empirical information exists on the effectiveness of nonprice conservation programs in reducing water demand. Previous econometric studies indicate these programs have had minimal impact. We examine the types and number of major nonprice conservation programs that have been implemented during an 11-year period in seven cities in the southwestern United States. A cross sectional, monthly time series residential water demand model, with parameters to control for variation in prices, temperature, precipitation and other factors, was used to empirically investigate the effectiveness of nonprice conservation programs in reducing water demand. We found significant reductions in use ranging between 1.1 percent and 4.0 percent per program. Because of the lack of information, we were unable to distinguish the effectiveness of individual or specific types of programs. Beyond finding that nonprice programs can be effective in reducing demand, questions regarding the efficiency and benefits to be achieved by conservation remain. As a step towards separating and evaluating the effects of individual programs, program benefits and efficiency, we recommend that utilities maintain more detailed and consistent information regarding the implementation of their nonprice programs.
Bibliography:istex:51D5B270151C804A21CC9D9449A0188424D00EE2
ArticleID:JAWR593
ark:/67375/WNG-8172QNDD-W
Paper No. 98097 of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association.Discussions are open until February 1, 2000.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1093-474X
1752-1688
DOI:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03615.x