Psychophysiological modelling of trust in technology: Comparative analysis of algorithm ensemble methods

Measuring user's trust in technology in real-time using psychophysiological signals depends on the availability of stable, accurate, variance sensitive, and non-bias trust classifier model which can be achieved through ensembling several algorithms. Prior efforts resulted to fairly accurate but...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2021 IEEE 19th World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI) pp. 000161 - 000168
Main Authors Ajenaghughrure, Ighoyota Ben, Da Costa Sousa, Sonia Claudia, Lamas, David
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 21.01.2021
Subjects
artificial intelligence
autonomous vehicle
Brain modeling
Classification algorithms
Ensemble machine learning
Feature extraction
Machine intelligence
Machine learning algorithms
psychophysiological signals
Real-time systems
Stacking
Trust
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Measuring user's trust in technology in real-time using psychophysiological signals depends on the availability of stable, accurate, variance sensitive, and non-bias trust classifier model which can be achieved through ensembling several algorithms. Prior efforts resulted to fairly accurate but unstable models. This article investigates what ensemble method is most suitable for developing an ensemble trust classifier model for assessing users trust in technology with psychophysiological signals. Using a self-driving car game, a within subject four condition experiment was implemented. During which 31 participant were involved, and multimodal psychophysiological data (EEG, ECG, EDA, and Facial-EMG) were recorded. An exhaustive 172 features from time and frequency domain were extracted. Six carefully selected algorithms were combined for developing ensemble trust classifier models using each of the four ensemble methods (voting, bagging, stacking, boosting). The result indicated that the Stack ensemble method was more superior, despite voting method dominating prior studies.
DOI:10.1109/SAMI50585.2021.9378655