Modeling Supervisor Safe Sets for Improving Collaboration in Human-Robot Teams

When a human supervisor collaborates with a team of robots, the human's attention is divided, and cognitive resources are at a premium. We aim to optimize the distribution of these resources and the flow of attention. To this end, we propose the model of an idealized supervisor to describe huma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) pp. 861 - 868
Main Authors McPherson, David L., Scobee, Dexter R.R., Menke, Joseph, Yang, Allen Y., Sastry, S. Shankar
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.10.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:When a human supervisor collaborates with a team of robots, the human's attention is divided, and cognitive resources are at a premium. We aim to optimize the distribution of these resources and the flow of attention. To this end, we propose the model of an idealized supervisor to describe human behavior. Such a supervisor employs a potentially inaccurate internal model of the the robots' dynamics to judge safety. We represent these safety judgements by constructing a safe set from this internal model using reachability theory. When a robot leaves this safe set, the idealized supervisor will intervene to assist, regardless of whether or not the robot remains objectively safe. False positives, where a human supervisor incorrectly judges a robot to be in danger, needlessly consume supervisor attention. In this work, we propose a method that decreases false positives by learning the supervisor's safe set and using that information to govern robot behavior. We prove that robots behaving according to our approach will reduce the occurrence of false positives for our idealized supervisor model. Furthermore, we empirically validate our approach with a user study that demonstrates a significant (p == 0.0328) reduction in false positives for our method compared to a baseline safety controller.
ISSN:2153-0866
DOI:10.1109/IROS.2018.8593865