Improvements in pedestrian movement prediction by considering multiple intentions in a Multi-Hypotheses filter

Fully automated vehicles and mobile robots have to operate in a shared environment with pedestrians in the future. To minimize the risk for pedestrians, it is very important to track them in a precise way. One important information source is the intention of the pedestrian. For the integration of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2018 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS) pp. 209 - 212
Main Authors Particke, Florian, Hiller, Markus, Feist, Christian, Thielecke, Jorn
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.04.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fully automated vehicles and mobile robots have to operate in a shared environment with pedestrians in the future. To minimize the risk for pedestrians, it is very important to track them in a precise way. One important information source is the intention of the pedestrian. For the integration of the intention information with conventional tracking algorithms, a Multi-Hypotheses filter is proposed, using a generalized potential field, which can be modeled using pedestrian movements. As the intention of the person is unknown, different hypotheses for the intention of the pedestrian are considered. The Multi-Hypotheses filter is used for the prediction of pedestrian trajectories and compared with a simple Kalman filter. The evaluation is performed in dependence on the free parameters, which are the prediction time, the tracking time and the measurement quality (modeled by additional additive white Gaussian noise). The proposed approach is evaluated using real camera data from a simple scenario in the Edinburgh Informatics Forum. For evaluation, the root mean square error and a confidence score, which is based on the normalized entropy, are considered. The Multi-Hypotheses based prediction outperforms the simple Kalman filter over the whole range of measurement quality, prediction and tracking time horizons in the case of the root mean square error and in the case of the confidence score.
ISSN:2153-3598
DOI:10.1109/PLANS.2018.8373383