Drop failure modes of a wafer-level chip-scale packaging

• Published in: 2013 14th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology pp. 1094 - 1098
• Main Authors: Mingliang Huang, Shuang Liu, Ning Zhao, Haohui Long, Jianhui Li, Weiqiang Hong
• Format: Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: IEEE 01.08.2013
• Subjects: board-level drop reliability; failure mode; Intermetallic; intermetallic compound (IMC); Joints; Packaging; Resins; Semiconductor device reliability; Sn-3Ag-0.5Cu solder joint; Soldering; wafer-level chip-scale packaging (WLCSP)
• DOI: 10.1109/ICEPT.2013.6756649

The present work evaluated the board level reliability of a kind of wafer-level chip-scale packaging (WLCSP). Drop impact tests were conducted to evaluate the lifetime and failure mode of the components before and after thermal cycles from -55 to 125 °C (50, 100, 150 temperature cycles) and high temperature (125 °C) storage (50 h, 100 h, 150 h). Under the peak acceleration of 1500 g and pulse duration of 0.5 ms, no failures were found in all of the components experienced thermal treatments after 300 drops. For the components without thermal treatments, cracks generated after 5000 drops under the shock condition with the peak acceleration of 2900 g and the pulse duration of 0.3 ms. Three kinds of failure modes were observed. The first was resin crack that generated between Cu pad and PCB; the second was internal cracks in the solder joints which generated near the IMC layer on the component side; and the third one was fracture of the Cu pad near the component. Among the above three failure modes, resin cracks most likely occurred during drop tests. The solder joints in the first row that closed to the center of PCB were checked after drop tests. Resin cracks were generally emerged at the two corners of the components. The internal cracks of solder joints tended to occur in the third solder joints, due to the resin cracks in the first and second joints released the impact energy. The cracks in Redistribution Layer (RDL) and fracture of Cu pad near the component least happened and always coexisted with the other two kinds of cracks. From the perspective of locations of components, cracks more easily generated in the components near the edge of PCB.