Joint probabilistic data association methods avoiding track coalescence
For the problem of tracking multiple targets the joint probabilistic data association (JPDA) filter has shown to be very effective in handling clutter and missed detections. The JPDA, however, also tends to coalesce neighbouring tracks. Through comparing JPDA with the exact nearest neighbour PDA (EN...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Vol. 3; pp. 2752 - 2757 vol.3 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
IEEE Control Systems Society
1995
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISBN | 0780326857 9780780326859 |
ISSN | 0191-2216 |
DOI | 10.1109/CDC.1995.478532 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | For the problem of tracking multiple targets the joint probabilistic data association (JPDA) filter has shown to be very effective in handling clutter and missed detections. The JPDA, however, also tends to coalesce neighbouring tracks. Through comparing JPDA with the exact nearest neighbour PDA (ENNPDA) filter, Fitzgerald has shown that hypotheses pruning is an effective way to prevent track coalescence. The dramatic pruning used for ENNPDA however leads to an undesired sensitivity to clutter and missed detections. In this paper new algorithms are derived which combine the advantages of JPDA and ENNPDA. The effectiveness of the new algorithms is shown through Monte Carlo simulations. |
---|---|
ISBN: | 0780326857 9780780326859 |
ISSN: | 0191-2216 |
DOI: | 10.1109/CDC.1995.478532 |