Neurally mediated syncope prediction based on changes of cardiovascular performance surrogates: Algorithms comparison

Two methodologies for neurally mediated syncope (NMS) prediction, based on the joint analysis of the electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG), are compared. Several features that characterize the variations in the inotropic, chronotropic, vascular tone and blood pressure surrogates were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics pp. 358 - 362
Main Authors Couceiro, R., Carvalho, P., Paiva, R. P., Henriques, J., Muehlsteff, J., Eickholt, C., Brinkmeyer, C., Kelm, M., Meyer, C.
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.10.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1948-2914
DOI10.1109/BMEI.2014.7002799

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two methodologies for neurally mediated syncope (NMS) prediction, based on the joint analysis of the electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG), are compared. Several features that characterize the variations in the inotropic, chronotropic, vascular tone and blood pressure surrogates were extracted and fed into two prediction models. The first method is based on the combination of the Minkowski distance metric with a threshold-based approach to evaluate the changes in the extracted features regarding the patient orthostatic stable state. The second method implements a SVM classification model to identify pre-syncope events. The output of the classification model is regularized using a "Firing power" (FP) measure and a threshold-based approach is used to generate alarms. Both methodologies were validated in 43 subjects using a three-way data split approach. The results achieved by the presented methodologies show that the first methodology is able to predict syncope episodes with better accuracy (sensitivity (SE) of 100% and specificity (SP) of 92%) while maintaining a low rate of false alarms (FPRh: 0.146h -1 ) and good prediction time (aPTime: 217.58s).
ISSN:1948-2914
DOI:10.1109/BMEI.2014.7002799