Structure, microstructure and magnetic properties of mixed rare earth oxide (Dy1-xErx)2O3

The mixed rare earth oxide (Dy1‐xErx)2O3 (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.0) were synthesized by a sol–gel process. X‐ray and neutron diffraction data were collected and crystal structure and microstructure analyses were performed using Rietveld refinement method. All samples were found to have the same crystal structu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCrystal research and technology (1979) Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 272 - 276
Main Authors Heiba, Z. K., Bakr Mohamed, M., Abdelslam, M. A., Fuess, L. H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin WILEY-VCH Verlag 01.03.2011
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The mixed rare earth oxide (Dy1‐xErx)2O3 (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.0) were synthesized by a sol–gel process. X‐ray and neutron diffraction data were collected and crystal structure and microstructure analyses were performed using Rietveld refinement method. All samples were found to have the same crystal structure and formed solid solutions over the whole range of x. Preferential cationic distribution is found for all samples but with different extent with Dy3+ preferring the 8b among the two non‐equivalent sites 8b and 24d of the space group Ia3. The lattice parameter is found to vary linearly with the composition x and a systematic variation is found in the r.m.s microstrain $ \langle \epsilon^2_{\rm L} \rangle^{1/2} $. Magnetization measurements were done in the temperature range 5‐300 K and a behavior in accordance with Curie‐Weiss law was found. Anomalous concentration dependence is found in magnetic susceptibility which is ascribed to the concentration dependence of effective crystal field combined with the contribution of 4I15/2 and 6H15/2 manifold at elevated temperature. The effective magnetic moments μeff is found to decrease linearly with composition parameter x, except for sample x=0.5 where the magnetization is enhanced. The Curie‐Weiss paramagnetic temperatures indicated antiferromagnetic interaction. These magnetic results are discussed in view of the cationic distribution. (© 2011 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Bibliography:ArticleID:CRAT201000706
ark:/67375/WNG-3X0RMVNN-0
istex:CAEB35230D510EFD78B4AF01B68B5E639B570DDD
ISSN:0232-1300
1521-4079
DOI:10.1002/crat.201000706